dui fort lauderdale criminal attorney fort lauderdale criminal lawyer fort lauderdale dui attorney fort lauderdale dui lawyer lauderdale
Rechercher Articles les plus lus· License Suspension Upheld, No Due Process Violation
 
	        Date de création : 14.08.2014
	        
	        	        	Dernière mise à jour :
	        	24.10.2014
	        	
	        	        5 articles
                
	        
An individual is required to have standing in order to contest the legality of a warrantless search. To be able to prove standing, the individual has to show a sufficient connection to an event & sufficient harm from the incident to support that person's or parties participation in the case. In matters which involve a search or seizure under the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, the determination is typically dependent on whether the individual had a "reasonable expectation of privacy" in the area or item that was searched. A person will generally have standing to challenge the legality of a search when that person has a reasonable expectation of privacy & has suffered an injury-in-fact from the search.
There are totally obvious locations wherein a person will no doubt have a reasonable expectation of privacy. There is no doubt that an individual would have a reasonable expectation of privacy in his own bedroom or house. Yet, often times there's no definitive line & the courts are required to determine if an individual has standing to challenge a search.
In the matter of Cooper vs. State, the First District Court of Appeal upheld the trial court's ruling that defendant did not have standing to challenge the search of a rental car driven by the defendant, of which defendant was neither the renter nor an authorized driver . The defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy, therefore he lacked a privacy interest, & accordingly did not have standing to challenge the legality of the search because he was not an authorized driver. The district court noted that this factual scenario was a matter of 1st impression in Florida & that the federal circuits were split. The district court agreed with the reasoning given by the Third, Fourth Fifth & Tenth Federal Circuit Courts of Appeal that all ruled that a person driving a rental car, who isn't an authorized driver, has no expectation of privacy and does not have standing to challenge a search of the vehicle.
For futher information concerning Criminal Attorney Fort Lauderdale or Fort Lauderdale DUI Lawyer please contact us at: The Law Offices of Michael A. Dye, PA 1 E Broward Blvd # 700
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
(954)990-0525